Title of InTitle of Internet Resource: Developments of alcoholism amongst youth
URL : http://alcoholism.about.com/cs/alerts/l/blnaa37.htm
Purpose
Are the aims of the website clearly stated?
Yes. The aim is to show the Risk Factors and Consequences on Youth Drinking
Coverage
What is the coverage of the site? Is it comprehensive? What subject areas and materials are covered? Are there any pointers to further information that enhance the coverage of the site? Are the links to other sites useful?
Its coverage is on the Risk Factors and Consequences on Youth Drinking. It is quite comprehensive as it covers the main aspect of the risk factors and consequences on youth drinking. The article is good and topics and subtopics are paragraph nicely to read. And there is a commentary by the director of National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Enoch Gordis. The webpage also provide article link to other articles like “Underage Drinking - A Major Public Health Challenge”. It citation also leads to other articles where we can read up more on alcoholism among youths. The links given are quite useful as it also provide some extra information which is missing like advertising effect, data statistic report…etc
Authority
Is this an authoritative source? Are there any reviews about this site or has it been included in any gateways or virtual libraries?
The article is a compilation from different sources and data , and the article is furnished from National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA).
Accuracy
Are the facts accurate? Does it use research as a basis? Is there political, ideological, or biasness in the source? Is it a factual site or one that contains an opinion? Are the references stated clearly? Is it free from grammatical, spelling and typographical errors?
The facts are accurate as it refers to different sources online for the data. Some resources it had used was even from websites that I had research on. And best of all, the resources cited by the author was from reputable websites like NIAAA. Since the website is on data for risk factors and consequences, its data are extracted from different sources, therefore it does not have any biasness in the article as it is just a compilation of the data from different articles. In terms of language, I don’t find any errors in it, and when used with MS Word, the errors detected was actually due to the language use as the article may be written in UK format whereas the MS word is using US dictionary.
Currency
Is the information up-to-date? Is it well-maintained?
I believe that the information is quite up to date as the website is About, Inc, which is a website which stores articles and arranges them in different subject. The website is quite well maintained as I can see that they don’t have any broken links or discrepancy in their webpage and their copyright is till 2006.
Accessibility
Is the site easily accessible? Does it require registration and log-ins? Are all the information accessible for FREE?
The site can be accessed easily and best of all, it articles are free and registration free, requires no log-in. Compared to other website where they demand premium to view their articles, this website is a good place to source for articles.
Presentation and Arrangement
Is the information well presented and arranged? Is the information clearly, consistently and logically presented and arranged? Are there any features such as site map, an index or a search facility? How effective are the search features in helping users to find information?
The information is well arranged and presented. It gives the user a fine and pleasant look to the eyes and u will not feel that it is very messy with the links and data arranged. The author separates them in terms of topics and sub-topics respectively. When a keyword is search, it will provides articles found in the sub-topics area, and from there we can even know the topic it is related to.
Usability
Is it easy to use and navigate around? Are there user support facilities?
As it is an article, there isn’t much to navigate, except to access the article. The user will have to look at the topic listing in order to find this article. There is also a search engine to look for articles in About.com, to look for articles of your choice.
Overall
What is your overall impression of the quality of the websites?
I find the website to be of high standard, and since it is an organization webpage, it is designed with a pleasant view for viewing of articles. And the quality of articles in the websites are of a certain standard as they will require the verification of the articles by a reputable organization for the topic written.
Reflections
Upon evaluating this website, I felt that it was difficult as there are a lot of information and I had practically read up the whole article. The article contains a lot of information that I could use for the topic I am currently researching on. Writing the template was tough, and I have to consider the language used for writing. But during the evaluation, I felt that the some of the template questions was quite redundant. And during answering the template’s question, some questions asked by the template was not applicable for the website I am evaluating. Thus I was not able to answer some of the template questions correctly.